Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Schedule

OK.  It's time to map out my schedule working up to application time.  As a refresher: I'll apply this Fall for admission in 2012 to various OB programs.  Here's my tentative checklist and rough schedule:

  • Finalize school list: May 1
  • LOR
    • Ask final recommender to write LOR: April 15
    • Send recommender "guide" to all letter writers: July 1(too soon?)
    • Send follow-up to letter writers: Sep 30 (?)
  • SOP
    • Complete draft SOP: May 1
    • Draft 2 of SOP: June 15
    • Final Draft SOP: August 1
And then there's my research pipeline:
  • Paper 1 (4th author)
    • Submit to journal: April 1
  • Paper 2 (1st author)
    • Present at conference: April
    • Complete additional analysis & rewrite: July 1
    • Submit to journal:  August 1
  • Paper 3 (5th author)
    • Present at conference: April

Monday, February 28, 2011

Collegiate Times Salary Database

On the note of income, a friend sent me this link to a Collegiate Times database of salaries for various universities.  There are some startling salaries there for business academics--ranging to well over $400,000 a year.  Further proof that, when you pursue your passion (and are committed and disciplined) the world will reward you.

Income

As a working professional with a family, a career that brings in a great income, and a life built around church, school and work here in sunny Central California, the thought of packing it in and heading across country to spend half a decade developing research skills is a little scary.  We've discussed with the kids and, while they are apprehensive about a new life somewhere else, and are, admittedly, not excited about a new school and a new church with new friends, they understand the reasons and are committed to the move.

And Shawna carries her own set of fears into this whole proposition; she's a little change adverse (whereas I probably enjoy change a little too much; she balances me perfectly), and I'd be lying if I said there weren't some reservations on her part.  She has a pretty enormous network of friends, and a life that's built around being "here", and restructuring that life around being "there", wherever "there" is, is a little scary.

The most pressing concern, though, for me (and perhaps Shawna as well) is the income thing.  At the end of the day, I am the provider for my family, and we have a great life; I make a really good income and we have a lot of freedom--freedom that is, without question, going to be restricted while in the PhD program.  There's going to be a challenge there, I know, but it's surmountable.

One of the things, though, that I have a great deal of peace about is income as a practicing academic.  I've read a lot of comments about academic salaries being lower than salaries in industry (particularly if you have an MBA, like I do), and on the whole, I think there's a lot of truth to that.  With my skill set and abilities, I know that there are opportunities out there where I could make, on the average, quite a bit more than the average business academic makes, and I've had people use this argument when trying to dissuade me from taking the academic path. 

But I'm old enough (and have enough experience) to know that income isn't always liberating; that is, sometimes higher income is like being in prison--it's very difficult to just walk away, regardless how miserable you are.  And as I think about those opportunities that exist in the world for me to make more money (than the average academic), most of them depress me.  Not that they aren't interesting, but they invariably bring a lot of baggage that fills me with dread.  Because the truth is, the thing that gets me going is research--exploring the uncharted territories and applying what I uncover to advance the field.

And here's the thing: not only is it what I love, it's my strength.  When I sit down and try to put my finger on that "thing" that, when it's all said and done, is going to allow me to make the greatest impact on the world, it's studying and advancing my chosen field.  Which brings this whole post around to my central point: income can't be a factor in making life decisions.  Here's why: income is simply an indicator of relative value that an individual provides to others.  Sure there are some anomalies in the data (I don't really see how Tiger Woods provides ~$100 mm in value, or how Justin Bieber provides $23 mm in value, to the world), but in general, the greater your contribution to society, the better your financial reward. 

And so my job as a functioning member of society is to determine where, and how, I can maximize my value contribution to society as a whole.  I'm sure I'd provide some value as an executive somewhere, but I'm convinced that affecting how businesses are organized toward some positive end will be far more valuable in the long-run.  And, frankly, studying and advancing knowledge vis-a-vis the academic literature is far more enjoyable to me than being a professional manager.  Hence, I'm sure I'll devote substantially more energy and time to the endeavor which translates into additional value to the world. 

My point, I guess, is that if I pick that thing that translates into me maximizing my value contribution, it will yield the highest level of income possible for me--and will, undoubtedly, bring me greater joy than any other conceivable career. 

Monday, February 21, 2011

CV Update

I've obsessed over my CV for a year, but thought it would be a good time to take an inventory of sorts.  First, the things that are long-gone (and that I can't change):
  • UGrad: low GPA from an unranked state college (10 years ago)
  • Grad: 4.0 MBA from second tier B-School
  • Work Experience:
    • 5 Years entrepreneurial experience (started a successful company)
    • 5 Years successful executive level experience with a large manufacturing company
And the things that I can still do something about (if I so choose):
  • GMAT: 750 (98 percentile); 48Q, 44V, 6.0 AWA.  Pretty happy with this; don't think I'll retake.
  • Research: 
    • Conferences: 5 presentations at 3 different conference (2 most prestigious conferences in the field; one international conference).  One PDW at Academy.
    • Papers: 2 under review (may have one accepted to a good journal by app-time); working on another. 
The question is: do the pros outweigh the cons (namely, the deplorable undergrad GPA)?  Not sure--but I'm told that the research experience I have coming in is pretty impressive; perhaps it'll be enough to outweigh the embarrassing undergrad credentials!

One way or the other, I'm certainly going to continue to focus on the research through the rest of the year.  Further, I plan to take a class or two (a calculus brush-up and perhaps a methods course).  Not sure what else I can do, at this point, to improve the CV.

...an update

Toward the end of last year, my wife and I sat down and discussed my academic aspirations.   I had a very in-depth discussion with my employer, and after much obsessive analysis, we decided to postpone our academic plans for a year.

There are positives and negatives to this strategy:

Cons:
  • Age: I just passed the 3 decade mark; an additional year means a lot more at 30 than it does at 23.
  • Children: moving away in Fall of '12 means my children will be in their mid-teens when I'm done with the program--not the greatest time to pack up and move across country to my first academic position.
Pros:
  • A chance to improve my SOP: I'm working on a few research projects; this year will (I hope) bring one (and possibly two) acceptances to well-respected journals; I'm first author on one of the papers.  All in all, this has to be a huge positive from the adcom perspective.
  • Cultivate relationships: the research I'm working on is with researchers from schools I'll be applying to.  Further, I'm attending a number of conferences this year; that'll be a great opportunity to network with researchers within the field.
  • Conference presentations: I've had three additional conference acceptances (all at top conferences) this year. 
  • Finances: I have an additional year to get things in place financially in preparation for the drastic reduction in income while in the program.
All in all, it was the right strategy.  I suspect, given my somewhat weak undergrad record, the additional research experience and the relationship with researchers that I'll develop this year will do much to earn my a better placement than I'd have achieved had I applied last year.

I think that the greatest gain over the past 6 months or so has been the reassurance that I've selected the right path.  There were still some slight doubts last year as to whether leaving a great job at a great organization making good money was the path for me.  But the additional research experience has all but settled it for me; I have no doubts that this is the right course for me (and, interestingly, the past few months seem to have reassured my wife as well).

So, I have a few more months to work before next application round.  In the meantime, good luck to those of you who applied this round; hope my "spot" (wherever that might've been) goes to a stellar candidate who does something incredible in the field!